Skip Navigation

The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 1948 1(1):103-124; doi:10.1093/qjmam/1.1.103
© 1948 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TAYLOR, G. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

THE FORMATION AND ENLARGEMENT OF A CIRCULAR HOLE IN A THIN PLASTIC SHEET

G. I. TAYLOR

( Trinity College Cambridge )

When a circular hole is made in a flat sheet by a conical-headed bullet or by outward radial pressure on its edge, the metal near the hole piles up into a thickened crater. The mechanics of this deformation is discussed. The interest of the problem lies in the fact that the complete strain-history of each element of the sheet has to be calculated. This is because the ratios of the principal stresses at each element of the sheet vary as the deformation proceeds, so that there is no relationship between the stress and total deformation but only between stress and strain increments occurring during a small expansion of the hole.

If b is the radius of the hole at any time, the strain is found to be elastic at points where r, the radius, is > 3.64b. In the annulus 2.21b < r < 3.64b the strain is plastic, but comparable in magnitude with the small elastic strain when r >3.64b. In the annulus b < r < 2.21b there is finite strain. At the edge of the hole the sheet has thickened to 2.61 times the thickness of the sheet.

Experiments made with lead show that the symmetrical deformation contemplated in this analysis does not occur; but an alternative unsymmetrical deformation is produced which calculation shows to require less work, in the ratio 2.6 to 1.0, than the symmetrical mode.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.