Skip Navigation

The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 1968 21(2):195-221; doi:10.1093/qjmam/21.2.195
© 1968 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BACKUS, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

APPLICATION OF A NON-LINEAR BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEM FOR LAPLACE'S EQUATION TO GRAVITY AND GEOMAGNETIC INTENSITY SURVEYS

GEORGE E. BACKUS

( Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics and Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego )

In modern geomagnetic and gravity surveys, field intensities are measured quite accurately, while field directions are often not measured at all. Determining the field from the survey data leads to an apparently new kind of boundary-value problem: given an open subset V of n-dimensional Euclidean space {varepsilon}n, and given a positive, real, continuous function {varepsilon}(x1,..., xn) defined on {partial}V, the boundary of V, we seek a real function {varepsilon}(x1,{varepsilon}, xn) harmonic in V and such that |{nabla}{varepsilon}|, the magnitude of the gradient of {varepsilon}, is equal to m on {partial}V. Is there always a solution {varepsilon} and is it unique? When n = 2, we prove that for any points z0,z1,..., za in V, there is precisely one harmonic solution {varepsilon} satisfying the boundary conditions and such that {nabla}{varepsilon} has a chosen direction at z0 and vanishes at z1,..., za and nowhere else in V. This non-uniqueness can be removed by the use of physical information not in the boundary-value problem as originally posed, but often easily obtainable. When n ≥ 3, we have no results on existence. If V is bounded, the non-uniqueness becomes worse as n increases, but if V is the exterior of a bounded set we have some partial results which suggest that the solution 5 be unique. In particular, if |{nabla}{Phi}| is known throughout V, {varepsilon} is determined except for sign; and if V is the exterior of a sphere and {varepsilon} is known to be a finite sum of exterior spherical harmonics, then {varepsilon} in V is determined except for sign by |{nabla}{Phi}| on {partial}V. Finally, if V is the exterior of a convex, bounded set and {varepsilon} is a gravitational field (i.e. can be extended to be sub-harmonic in {varepsilon}n) then {varepsilon} is uniquely determined in V by the values of |{nabla}{Phi}| on {partial}V.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.