Skip Navigation

The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 1975 28(1):47-62; doi:10.1093/qjmam/28.1.47
© 1975 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BEATTY, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by USMANI, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

ON THE INDENTATION OF A HIGHLY ELASTIC HALF-SPACE

M. F. BEATTY and S. A. USMANI

( Department of Engineering Mechanics, University of Kentucky )

Infinitesimal indentation by an axisymmetric rigid punch pressed normal to the plane boundary of a compressible, isotropic, elastic half-space subject initially to a uniform, finite deformation by a hydrostatic stress in planes parallel to the surface is studied to determine the influence of the material response, the initial finite deformation, and the punch geometry on both the incremental normal-stress distribution and the total applied indentation pressure. It is shown that the incremental stress distribution at the punch face is a function of the total applied normal force and the indentation geometry alone, and this leads naturally to a weak universal relation for a flat-ended punch. It is found that there exists an all-around hydrostatic plane stress at which the free surface is unable to support any normal indentation disturbance, however small; this collapse condition is identified as a surface instability phenomenon. The general reduction to the well-known classical solution is demonstrated for every isotropic elastic material. Details of the general analysis are illustrated for isotropic, hyperelastic Hadamard materials and several theorems are provided for this special situation. It is shown in each instance that the solution includes as a special case results derived elsewhere for incompressible, hyperelastic bodies in general, and for Mooney–Rivlin materials in particular; but the methods used here are totally different.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.